aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarek Olšák <maraeo@gmail.com>2010-09-11 23:09:12 -0400
committerDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>2010-09-13 06:30:02 -0400
commitec00efb72f4b88078427d01f38f664c67c7ca0c0 (patch)
tree9cd8810b734378eb02704babcb7d5ebb476da1a2 /drivers/gpu
parentb741be82cf2079f71553af595610f17a3a3a752a (diff)
drm/radeon/kms: increase lockup detection interval to 10 sec for r100-r500
One subtest of mesa/demos/gltestperf takes 9 seconds to complete, so to prevent an unnecessary gpu reset followed by a hardlock, I am increasing the interval to 10 seconds after which a GPU is considered in a locked-up state. This is on RV530. However, with a little slower GPU, we would surpass the interval easily, so this is not a good fix for gltestperf. Nevertheless, this commit also fixes hardlocks in the applications which render at speed of less than 1 frame per second, where the whole frame consists of only one command stream. The game Tiny & Big is an example. This bar is now lowered to 0.1 fps. Now the question comes down to whether we should (often unsuccessfully) reset the GPU at all? Once we have stable enough drivers, we won't have to. Has the time come already? If possible, this commit should go to stable as well. Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák <maraeo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c13
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
index e817a0bb5eb..ec64b365ee1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
@@ -2020,18 +2020,7 @@ bool r100_gpu_cp_is_lockup(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct r100_gpu_lockup *l
2020 return false; 2020 return false;
2021 } 2021 }
2022 elapsed = jiffies_to_msecs(cjiffies - lockup->last_jiffies); 2022 elapsed = jiffies_to_msecs(cjiffies - lockup->last_jiffies);
2023 if (elapsed >= 3000) { 2023 if (elapsed >= 10000) {
2024 /* very likely the improbable case where current
2025 * rptr is equal to last recorded, a while ago, rptr
2026 * this is more likely a false positive update tracking
2027 * information which should force us to be recall at
2028 * latter point
2029 */
2030 lockup->last_cp_rptr = cp->rptr;
2031 lockup->last_jiffies = jiffies;
2032 return false;
2033 }
2034 if (elapsed >= 1000) {
2035 dev_err(rdev->dev, "GPU lockup CP stall for more than %lumsec\n", elapsed); 2024 dev_err(rdev->dev, "GPU lockup CP stall for more than %lumsec\n", elapsed);
2036 return true; 2025 return true;
2037 } 2026 }