aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMagnus Damm <magnus@valinux.co.jp>2007-02-03 04:13:48 -0500
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>2007-02-03 14:26:06 -0500
commit29a002776ba5ef170446910b1f93c480cdd43706 (patch)
treefa06004ecc2495d8b2b17b6fb2129365b7fd9eaf /arch
parentdee11c2364f51cac53df17d742a0c69097e29a4e (diff)
[PATCH] kexec: Avoid migration of already disabled irqs (ia64)
This patch fixes up ia64 kexec support for HP rx2620 hardware. It does this by skipping migration of already disabled irqs. This is most likely a problem on other ia64 platforms as well, but I've only been able to reproduce it on one machine so far. The full story is that handle_bad_irq() gets invoked before starting the new kernel without this patch. This seems to happen when fixup_irqs() calls generic_handle_irq() on already migrated (and disabled) irqs. So by avoiding migration of disabled irqs we stay away of handle_bad_irq(). The code has been tested on three different ia64 machines, all with good results. It is possible to trigger the same bug by offlining a processor using echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online. More detailed information is available in the following mail thread: http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/fastboot/2007-January/thread.html#5774 Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <magnus@valinux.co.jp> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> Acked-by: Zou, Nanhai <nanhai.zou@intel.com> Acked-by: Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com> Acked-by: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r--arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c3
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c
index 54d55e4d64f..ce49c85c928 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c
@@ -122,6 +122,9 @@ static void migrate_irqs(void)
122 for (irq=0; irq < NR_IRQS; irq++) { 122 for (irq=0; irq < NR_IRQS; irq++) {
123 desc = irq_desc + irq; 123 desc = irq_desc + irq;
124 124
125 if (desc->status == IRQ_DISABLED)
126 continue;
127
125 /* 128 /*
126 * No handling for now. 129 * No handling for now.
127 * TBD: Implement a disable function so we can now 130 * TBD: Implement a disable function so we can now