diff options
author | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> | 2009-10-14 14:43:22 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> | 2009-10-15 09:25:20 -0400 |
commit | 1243ba98e3abecd12e9e90dd390801b95ef070f2 (patch) | |
tree | a91c9f3d739e3d7ca7e4dca5df8895b42f81ddca /Documentation | |
parent | 161291396e76e0832c08f617eb9bd364d1648148 (diff) |
Update flex_arrays.txt
The 2.6.32 merge window brought a number of changes to the flexible array
API; this patch updates the documentation to match the new state of
affairs.
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/flexible-arrays.txt | 43 |
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/flexible-arrays.txt b/Documentation/flexible-arrays.txt index 84eb26808de..cb8a3a00cc9 100644 --- a/Documentation/flexible-arrays.txt +++ b/Documentation/flexible-arrays.txt | |||
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
1 | Using flexible arrays in the kernel | 1 | Using flexible arrays in the kernel |
2 | Last updated for 2.6.31 | 2 | Last updated for 2.6.32 |
3 | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> | 3 | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> |
4 | 4 | ||
5 | Large contiguous memory allocations can be unreliable in the Linux kernel. | 5 | Large contiguous memory allocations can be unreliable in the Linux kernel. |
@@ -40,6 +40,13 @@ argument is passed directly to the internal memory allocation calls. With | |||
40 | the current code, using flags to ask for high memory is likely to lead to | 40 | the current code, using flags to ask for high memory is likely to lead to |
41 | notably unpleasant side effects. | 41 | notably unpleasant side effects. |
42 | 42 | ||
43 | It is also possible to define flexible arrays at compile time with: | ||
44 | |||
45 | DEFINE_FLEX_ARRAY(name, element_size, total); | ||
46 | |||
47 | This macro will result in a definition of an array with the given name; the | ||
48 | element size and total will be checked for validity at compile time. | ||
49 | |||
43 | Storing data into a flexible array is accomplished with a call to: | 50 | Storing data into a flexible array is accomplished with a call to: |
44 | 51 | ||
45 | int flex_array_put(struct flex_array *array, unsigned int element_nr, | 52 | int flex_array_put(struct flex_array *array, unsigned int element_nr, |
@@ -76,16 +83,30 @@ particular element has never been allocated. | |||
76 | Note that it is possible to get back a valid pointer for an element which | 83 | Note that it is possible to get back a valid pointer for an element which |
77 | has never been stored in the array. Memory for array elements is allocated | 84 | has never been stored in the array. Memory for array elements is allocated |
78 | one page at a time; a single allocation could provide memory for several | 85 | one page at a time; a single allocation could provide memory for several |
79 | adjacent elements. The flexible array code does not know if a specific | 86 | adjacent elements. Flexible array elements are normally initialized to the |
80 | element has been written; it only knows if the associated memory is | 87 | value FLEX_ARRAY_FREE (defined as 0x6c in <linux/poison.h>), so errors |
81 | present. So a flex_array_get() call on an element which was never stored | 88 | involving that number probably result from use of unstored array entries. |
82 | in the array has the potential to return a pointer to random data. If the | 89 | Note that, if array elements are allocated with __GFP_ZERO, they will be |
83 | caller does not have a separate way to know which elements were actually | 90 | initialized to zero and this poisoning will not happen. |
84 | stored, it might be wise, at least, to add GFP_ZERO to the flags argument | 91 | |
85 | to ensure that all elements are zeroed. | 92 | Individual elements in the array can be cleared with: |
86 | 93 | ||
87 | There is no way to remove a single element from the array. It is possible, | 94 | int flex_array_clear(struct flex_array *array, unsigned int element_nr); |
88 | though, to remove all elements with a call to: | 95 | |
96 | This function will set the given element to FLEX_ARRAY_FREE and return | ||
97 | zero. If storage for the indicated element is not allocated for the array, | ||
98 | flex_array_clear() will return -EINVAL instead. Note that clearing an | ||
99 | element does not release the storage associated with it; to reduce the | ||
100 | allocated size of an array, call: | ||
101 | |||
102 | int flex_array_shrink(struct flex_array *array); | ||
103 | |||
104 | The return value will be the number of pages of memory actually freed. | ||
105 | This function works by scanning the array for pages containing nothing but | ||
106 | FLEX_ARRAY_FREE bytes, so (1) it can be expensive, and (2) it will not work | ||
107 | if the array's pages are allocated with __GFP_ZERO. | ||
108 | |||
109 | It is possible to remove all elements of an array with a call to: | ||
89 | 110 | ||
90 | void flex_array_free_parts(struct flex_array *array); | 111 | void flex_array_free_parts(struct flex_array *array); |
91 | 112 | ||