inet: Fix __inet_inherit_port() to correctly increment bsockets and num_owners

inet sockets corresponding to passive connections are added to the bind hash
using ___inet_inherit_port(). These sockets are later removed from the bind
hash using __inet_put_port(). These two functions are not exactly symmetrical.
__inet_put_port() decrements hashinfo->bsockets and tb->num_owners, whereas
___inet_inherit_port() does not increment them. This results in both of these
going to -ve values.

This patch fixes this by calling inet_bind_hash() from ___inet_inherit_port(),
which does the right thing.

'bsockets' and 'num_owners' were introduced by commit a9d8f9110d7e953c
(inet: Allowing more than 64k connections and heavily optimize bind(0))

Signed-off-by: Nagendra Singh Tomar <tomer_iisc@yahoo.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
index 1b344f30b46..3c0369a3a66 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -133,8 +133,7 @@ int __inet_inherit_port(struct sock *sk, struct sock *child)
                         }
                 }
         }
-        sk_add_bind_node(child, &tb->owners);
-        inet_csk(child)->icsk_bind_hash = tb;
+        inet_bind_hash(child, tb, port);
         spin_unlock(&head->lock);
 
         return 0;