NFSv4.1: Use nfs41_setup_sequence where appropriate

There is no point in using nfs4_setup_sequence or nfs4_sequence_done
in pure NFSv4.1 functions. We already know that those have sessions...

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index ecd4ed3a4f65..39d24158f97f 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -597,10 +597,11 @@ struct nfs41_call_sync_data {
 static void nfs41_call_sync_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 {
         struct nfs41_call_sync_data *data = calldata;
+        struct nfs4_session *session = nfs4_get_session(data->seq_server);
 
         dprintk("--> %s data->seq_server %p\n", __func__, data->seq_server);
 
-        if (nfs4_setup_sequence(data->seq_server, data->seq_args,
+        if (nfs41_setup_sequence(session, data->seq_args,
                                 data->seq_res, task))
                 return;
         rpc_call_start(task);
@@ -6018,6 +6019,7 @@ nfs4_layoutget_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 {
         struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp = calldata;
         struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(lgp->args.inode);
+        struct nfs4_session *session = nfs4_get_session(server);
 
         dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
         /* Note the is a race here, where a CB_LAYOUTRECALL can come in
@@ -6025,7 +6027,7 @@ nfs4_layoutget_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
          * However, that is not so catastrophic, and there seems
          * to be no way to prevent it completely.
          */
-        if (nfs4_setup_sequence(server, &lgp->args.seq_args,
+        if (nfs41_setup_sequence(session, &lgp->args.seq_args,
                                 &lgp->res.seq_res, task))
                 return;
         if (pnfs_choose_layoutget_stateid(&lgp->args.stateid,
@@ -6047,7 +6049,7 @@ static void nfs4_layoutget_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 
         dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
 
-        if (!nfs4_sequence_done(task, &lgp->res.seq_res))
+        if (!nfs41_sequence_done(task, &lgp->res.seq_res))
                 goto out;
 
         switch (task->tk_status) {
@@ -6211,7 +6213,7 @@ static void nfs4_layoutreturn_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 
         dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
 
-        if (!nfs4_sequence_done(task, &lrp->res.seq_res))
+        if (!nfs41_sequence_done(task, &lrp->res.seq_res))
                 return;
 
         server = NFS_SERVER(lrp->args.inode);
@@ -6360,8 +6362,9 @@ static void nfs4_layoutcommit_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 {
         struct nfs4_layoutcommit_data *data = calldata;
         struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(data->args.inode);
+        struct nfs4_session *session = nfs4_get_session(server);
 
-        if (nfs4_setup_sequence(server, &data->args.seq_args,
+        if (nfs41_setup_sequence(session, &data->args.seq_args,
                                 &data->res.seq_res, task))
                 return;
         rpc_call_start(task);
@@ -6373,7 +6376,7 @@ nfs4_layoutcommit_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
         struct nfs4_layoutcommit_data *data = calldata;
         struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(data->args.inode);
 
-        if (!nfs4_sequence_done(task, &data->res.seq_res))
+        if (!nfs41_sequence_done(task, &data->res.seq_res))
                 return;
 
         switch (task->tk_status) { /* Just ignore these failures */