ENGR00302227-6 mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add imx6sx support

The imx6sx usdhc is derived from imx6sl, the difference is minor.
imx6sx have the errata ESDHC_FLAG_ERR004536 fixed.
So introduce a new compatible string for imx6sx to distinguish them.

Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
index d2eb8911dc98..bf02355121ed 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
@@ -150,6 +150,11 @@ static struct esdhc_soc_data usdhc_imx6sl_data = {
                         | ESDHC_FLAG_BUSFREQ,
 };
 
+static struct esdhc_soc_data usdhc_imx6sx_data = {
+        .flags = ESDHC_FLAG_USDHC | ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING
+                        | ESDHC_FLAG_HAVE_CAP1,
+};
+
 struct pltfm_imx_data {
         u32 scratchpad;
         struct pinctrl *pinctrl;
@@ -191,6 +196,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id imx_esdhc_dt_ids[] = {
         { .compatible = "fsl,imx35-esdhc", .data = &esdhc_imx35_data, },
         { .compatible = "fsl,imx51-esdhc", .data = &esdhc_imx51_data, },
         { .compatible = "fsl,imx53-esdhc", .data = &esdhc_imx53_data, },
+        { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imx6sx_data, },
         { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sl-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imx6sl_data, },
         { .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imx6q_data, },
         { /* sentinel */ }