clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
index 86654d7e1afe..7758bc0617cb 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static void irqsoff_print_header(struct seq_file *s)
 /*
  * Should this new latency be reported/recorded?
  */
-static bool report_latency(struct trace_array *tr, cycle_t delta)
+static bool report_latency(struct trace_array *tr, u64 delta)
 {
         if (tracing_thresh) {
                 if (delta < tracing_thresh)
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ check_critical_timing(struct trace_array *tr,
                       unsigned long parent_ip,
                       int cpu)
 {
-        cycle_t T0, T1, delta;
+        u64 T0, T1, delta;
         unsigned long flags;
         int pc;