bpf: Add BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT.

Often we want to write tests cases that check things like bad context
offset accesses.  And one way to do this is to use an odd offset on,
for example, a 32-bit load.

This unfortunately triggers the alignment checks first on platforms
that do not set CONFIG_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.  So the test
case see the alignment failure rather than what it was testing for.

It is often not completely possible to respect the original intention
of the test, or even test the same exact thing, while solving the
alignment issue.

Another option could have been to check the alignment after the
context and other validations are performed by the verifier, but
that is a non-trivial change to the verifier.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 85cbeec06e50..f9554d9a14e1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1452,9 +1452,14 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
         if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_PROG_LOAD))
                 return -EINVAL;
 
-        if (attr->prog_flags & ~BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT)
+        if (attr->prog_flags & ~(BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT | BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT))
                 return -EINVAL;
 
+        if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
+            (attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT) &&
+            !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+                return -EPERM;
+
         /* copy eBPF program license from user space */
         if (strncpy_from_user(license, u64_to_user_ptr(attr->license),
                               sizeof(license) - 1) < 0)