cfg80211: remove 80+80 MHz rate reporting

These rates are treated the same as 160 MHz in the spec, so
it makes no sense to distinguish them. As no driver uses them
yet, this is also not a problem, just remove them.

In the userspace API the field remains reserved to preserve
API and ABI.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/include/net/cfg80211.h b/include/net/cfg80211.h
index 38abc07503fd..0322048fddab 100644
--- a/include/net/cfg80211.h
+++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
@@ -875,7 +875,6 @@ int cfg80211_check_station_change(struct wiphy *wiphy,
  * @RATE_INFO_FLAGS_VHT_MCS: mcs field filled with VHT MCS
  * @RATE_INFO_FLAGS_40_MHZ_WIDTH: 40 MHz width transmission
  * @RATE_INFO_FLAGS_80_MHZ_WIDTH: 80 MHz width transmission
- * @RATE_INFO_FLAGS_80P80_MHZ_WIDTH: 80+80 MHz width transmission
  * @RATE_INFO_FLAGS_160_MHZ_WIDTH: 160 MHz width transmission
  * @RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI: 400ns guard interval
  * @RATE_INFO_FLAGS_60G: 60GHz MCS
@@ -885,10 +884,9 @@ enum rate_info_flags {
         RATE_INFO_FLAGS_VHT_MCS                 = BIT(1),
         RATE_INFO_FLAGS_40_MHZ_WIDTH            = BIT(2),
         RATE_INFO_FLAGS_80_MHZ_WIDTH            = BIT(3),
-        RATE_INFO_FLAGS_80P80_MHZ_WIDTH         = BIT(4),
-        RATE_INFO_FLAGS_160_MHZ_WIDTH           = BIT(5),
-        RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI                = BIT(6),
-        RATE_INFO_FLAGS_60G                     = BIT(7),
+        RATE_INFO_FLAGS_160_MHZ_WIDTH           = BIT(4),
+        RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI                = BIT(5),
+        RATE_INFO_FLAGS_60G                     = BIT(6),
 };
 
 /**