aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/linux/nospec.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>2018-02-16 16:20:42 -0500
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2018-02-17 02:40:59 -0500
commit1d91c1d2c80cb70e2e553845e278b87a960c04da (patch)
treef69d797b188ba1e478d7de6e5a41de96b897f76d /include/linux/nospec.h
parentd4667ca142610961c89ae7c41a823b3358fcdd0e (diff)
nospec: Kill array_index_nospec_mask_check()
There are multiple problems with the dynamic sanity checking in array_index_nospec_mask_check(): * It causes unnecessary overhead in the 32-bit case since integer sized @index values will no longer cause the check to be compiled away like in the 64-bit case. * In the 32-bit case it may trigger with user controllable input when the expectation is that should only trigger during development of new kernel enabling. * The macro reuses the input parameter in multiple locations which is broken if someone passes an expression like 'index++' to array_index_nospec(). Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/151881604278.17395.6605847763178076520.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/nospec.h')
-rw-r--r--include/linux/nospec.h22
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/nospec.h b/include/linux/nospec.h
index fbc98e2c8228..d6701e34424f 100644
--- a/include/linux/nospec.h
+++ b/include/linux/nospec.h
@@ -30,26 +30,6 @@ static inline unsigned long array_index_mask_nospec(unsigned long index,
30#endif 30#endif
31 31
32/* 32/*
33 * Warn developers about inappropriate array_index_nospec() usage.
34 *
35 * Even if the CPU speculates past the WARN_ONCE branch, the
36 * sign bit of @index is taken into account when generating the
37 * mask.
38 *
39 * This warning is compiled out when the compiler can infer that
40 * @index and @size are less than LONG_MAX.
41 */
42#define array_index_mask_nospec_check(index, size) \
43({ \
44 if (WARN_ONCE(index > LONG_MAX || size > LONG_MAX, \
45 "array_index_nospec() limited to range of [0, LONG_MAX]\n")) \
46 _mask = 0; \
47 else \
48 _mask = array_index_mask_nospec(index, size); \
49 _mask; \
50})
51
52/*
53 * array_index_nospec - sanitize an array index after a bounds check 33 * array_index_nospec - sanitize an array index after a bounds check
54 * 34 *
55 * For a code sequence like: 35 * For a code sequence like:
@@ -67,7 +47,7 @@ static inline unsigned long array_index_mask_nospec(unsigned long index,
67({ \ 47({ \
68 typeof(index) _i = (index); \ 48 typeof(index) _i = (index); \
69 typeof(size) _s = (size); \ 49 typeof(size) _s = (size); \
70 unsigned long _mask = array_index_mask_nospec_check(_i, _s); \ 50 unsigned long _mask = array_index_mask_nospec(_i, _s); \
71 \ 51 \
72 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(_i) > sizeof(long)); \ 52 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(_i) > sizeof(long)); \
73 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(_s) > sizeof(long)); \ 53 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(_s) > sizeof(long)); \