tracing: Process constants for (un)likely() profiler

When running the likely/unlikely profiler, one of the results did not look
accurate. It noted that the unlikely() in link_path_walk() was 100%
incorrect. When I added a trace_printk() to see what was happening there, it
became 80% correct! Looking deeper into what whas happening, I found that
gcc split that if statement into two paths. One where the if statement
became a constant, the other path a variable. The other path had the if
statement always hit (making the unlikely there, always false), but since
the #define unlikely() has:

  #define unlikely() (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? !!(x) : __branch_check__(x, 0))

Where constants are ignored by the branch profiler, the "constant" path
made by the compiler was ignored, even though it was hit 80% of the time.

By just passing the constant value to the __branch_check__() function and
tracing it out of line (as always correct, as likely/unlikely isn't a factor
for constants), then we get back the accurate readings of branches that were
optimized by gcc causing part of the execution to become constant.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index cf0fa5d86059..bbbe1570de1c 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -107,12 +107,13 @@ struct ftrace_branch_data {
  */
 #if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING) \
     && !defined(DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING) && !defined(__CHECKER__)
-void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
+void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val,
+                          int expect, int is_constant);
 
 #define likely_notrace(x)       __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
 #define unlikely_notrace(x)     __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
 
-#define __branch_check__(x, expect) ({                                  \
+#define __branch_check__(x, expect, is_constant) ({                     \
                         int ______r;                                    \
                         static struct ftrace_branch_data                \
                                 __attribute__((__aligned__(4)))         \
@@ -122,8 +123,9 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
                                 .file = __FILE__,                       \
                                 .line = __LINE__,                       \
                         };                                              \
-                        ______r = likely_notrace(x);                    \
-                        ftrace_likely_update(&______f, ______r, expect); \
+                        ______r = __builtin_expect(!!(x), expect);      \
+                        ftrace_likely_update(&______f, ______r,         \
+                                             expect, is_constant);      \
                         ______r;                                        \
                 })
 
@@ -133,10 +135,10 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
  * written by Daniel Walker.
  */
 # ifndef likely
-#  define likely(x)     (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? !!(x) : __branch_check__(x, 1))
+#  define likely(x)     (__branch_check__(x, 1, __builtin_constant_p(x)))
 # endif
 # ifndef unlikely
-#  define unlikely(x)   (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? !!(x) : __branch_check__(x, 0))
+#  define unlikely(x)   (__branch_check__(x, 0, __builtin_constant_p(x)))
 # endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES