DMA-API: amba: get rid of separate dma_mask

AMBA Primecell devices always treat streaming and coherent DMA exactly
the same, so there's no point in having the masks separated.

Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/amba/bus.h b/include/linux/amba/bus.h
index 43ec7e247a80..682df0e1954a 100644
--- a/include/linux/amba/bus.h
+++ b/include/linux/amba/bus.h
@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ struct amba_device {
         struct device           dev;
         struct resource         res;
         struct clk              *pclk;
-        u64                     dma_mask;
         unsigned int            periphid;
         unsigned int            irq[AMBA_NR_IRQS];
 };
@@ -131,7 +130,6 @@ struct amba_device name##_device = {				\
 struct amba_device name##_device = {                            \
         .dev = __AMBA_DEV(busid, data, ~0ULL),                  \
         .res = DEFINE_RES_MEM(base, SZ_4K),                     \
-        .dma_mask = ~0ULL,                                      \
         .irq = irqs,                                            \
         .periphid = id,                                         \
 }