Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs

Pull more vfs updates from Al Viro:
 "Assorted VFS fixes and related cleanups (IMO the most interesting in
  that part are f_path-related things and Eric's descriptor-related
  stuff).  UFS regression fixes (it got broken last cycle).  9P fixes.
  fs-cache series, DAX patches, Jan's file_remove_suid() work"

[ I'd say this is much more than "fixes and related cleanups".  The
  file_table locking rule change by Eric Dumazet is a rather big and
  fundamental update even if the patch isn't huge.   - Linus ]

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (49 commits)
  9p: cope with bogus responses from server in p9_client_{read,write}
  p9_client_write(): avoid double p9_free_req()
  9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC
  dax: bdev_direct_access() may sleep
  block: Add support for DAX reads/writes to block devices
  dax: Use copy_from_iter_nocache
  dax: Add block size note to documentation
  fs/file.c: __fget() and dup2() atomicity rules
  fs/file.c: don't acquire files->file_lock in fd_install()
  fs:super:get_anon_bdev: fix race condition could cause dev exceed its upper limitation
  vfs: avoid creation of inode number 0 in get_next_ino
  namei: make set_root_rcu() return void
  make simple_positive() public
  ufs: use dir_pages instead of ufs_dir_pages()
  pagemap.h: move dir_pages() over there
  remove the pointless include of lglock.h
  fs: cleanup slight list_entry abuse
  xfs: Correctly lock inode when removing suid and file capabilities
  fs: Call security_ops->inode_killpriv on truncate
  fs: Provide function telling whether file_remove_privs() will do anything
  ...

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/fs/tracefs/inode.c b/fs/tracefs/inode.c
index a43df11a163f..cbc8d5d2755a 100644
--- a/fs/tracefs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/tracefs/inode.c
@@ -496,16 +496,11 @@ struct dentry *tracefs_create_instance_dir(const char *name, struct dentry *pare
         return dentry;
 }
 
-static inline int tracefs_positive(struct dentry *dentry)
-{
-        return dentry->d_inode && !d_unhashed(dentry);
-}
-
 static int __tracefs_remove(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
 {
         int ret = 0;
 
-        if (tracefs_positive(dentry)) {
+        if (simple_positive(dentry)) {
                 if (dentry->d_inode) {
                         dget(dentry);
                         switch (dentry->d_inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) {
@@ -582,7 +577,7 @@ void tracefs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry)
          */
         spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
         list_for_each_entry(child, &parent->d_subdirs, d_child) {
-                if (!tracefs_positive(child))
+                if (!simple_positive(child))
                         continue;
 
                 /* perhaps simple_empty(child) makes more sense */
@@ -603,7 +598,7 @@ void tracefs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry)
                  * from d_subdirs. When releasing the parent->d_lock we can
                  * no longer trust that the next pointer is valid.
                  * Restart the loop. We'll skip this one with the
-                 * tracefs_positive() check.
+                 * simple_positive() check.
                  */
                 goto loop;
         }