xenbus: prefer list_for_each()

This is more efficient than list_for_each_safe() when list modification
is accompanied by breaking out of the loop.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c
index 7487971f9f78..fe60b12de920 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ out:
 
 static int xenbus_write_watch(unsigned msg_type, struct xenbus_file_priv *u)
 {
-        struct watch_adapter *watch, *tmp_watch;
+        struct watch_adapter *watch;
         char *path, *token;
         int err, rc;
         LIST_HEAD(staging_q);
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int xenbus_write_watch(unsigned msg_type, struct xenbus_file_priv *u)
                 }
                 list_add(&watch->list, &u->watches);
         } else {
-                list_for_each_entry_safe(watch, tmp_watch, &u->watches, list) {
+                list_for_each_entry(watch, &u->watches, list) {
                         if (!strcmp(watch->token, token) &&
                             !strcmp(watch->watch.node, path)) {
                                 unregister_xenbus_watch(&watch->watch);