drm/radeon/r300: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "Pass through." with
"Fall through.", which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114734 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114735 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
index 21161aa8acbf..652126fd6dd4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static int r300_packet0_check(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
                                           ((idx_value >> 21) & 0xF));
                                 return -EINVAL;
                         }
-                        /* Pass through. */
+                        /* Fall through. */
                 case 6:
                         track->cb[i].cpp = 4;
                         break;
@@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ static int r300_packet0_check(struct radeon_cs_parser *p,
                                 return -EINVAL;
                         }
                         /* The same rules apply as for DXT3/5. */
-                        /* Pass through. */
+                        /* Fall through. */
                 case R300_TX_FORMAT_DXT3:
                 case R300_TX_FORMAT_DXT5:
                         track->textures[i].cpp = 1;