drm/i915: s/i915_wait_request/i915_wait_seqno/g

Wait request is poorly named IMO. After working with these functions for
some time, I feel it's much clearer to name the functions more
appropriately.

Of course we must update the callers to use the new name as well.

This leaves room within our namespace for a *real* wait request function
at some point.

Note to maintainer: this patch is optional.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
index 458743da3774..830d0dd610e1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int intel_overlay_do_wait_request(struct intel_overlay *overlay,
         }
         overlay->last_flip_req = request->seqno;
         overlay->flip_tail = tail;
-        ret = i915_wait_request(ring, overlay->last_flip_req);
+        ret = i915_wait_seqno(ring, overlay->last_flip_req);
         if (ret)
                 return ret;
         i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int intel_overlay_recover_from_interrupt(struct intel_overlay *overlay)
         if (overlay->last_flip_req == 0)
                 return 0;
 
-        ret = i915_wait_request(ring, overlay->last_flip_req);
+        ret = i915_wait_seqno(ring, overlay->last_flip_req);
         if (ret)
                 return ret;
         i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);