drm/amdgpu: Add comment to describe the purpose of one difficult if statement

Use == instead of != in the if statement to make code easier understood

Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
index 00cb58905e94..8dafbd3c427f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
@@ -780,8 +780,13 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
                 next_pe_start = amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(pt);
                 next_pe_start += (addr & mask) * 8;
 
-                if (cur_pe_end != next_pe_start) {
-
+                if (cur_pe_end == next_pe_start) {
+                        /* The next ptb is consecutive to current ptb.
+                         * Don't call amdgpu_vm_frag_ptes now.
+                         * Will update two ptbs together in future.
+                        */
+                        cur_pe_end += 8 * nptes;
+                } else {
                         amdgpu_vm_frag_ptes(adev, vm_update_params,
                                             cur_pe_start, cur_pe_end,
                                             cur_dst, flags);
@@ -789,8 +794,6 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
                         cur_pe_start = next_pe_start;
                         cur_pe_end = next_pe_start + 8 * nptes;
                         cur_dst = dst;
-                } else {
-                        cur_pe_end += 8 * nptes;
                 }
 
                 addr += nptes;