clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-32k.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-32k.c
index cf5b14e442e4..624067712ef0 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-32k.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-32k.c
@@ -65,11 +65,11 @@ static inline struct ti_32k *to_ti_32k(struct clocksource *cs)
         return container_of(cs, struct ti_32k, cs);
 }
 
-static cycle_t notrace ti_32k_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 notrace ti_32k_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
 {
         struct ti_32k *ti = to_ti_32k(cs);
 
-        return (cycle_t)readl_relaxed(ti->counter);
+        return (u64)readl_relaxed(ti->counter);
 }
 
 static struct ti_32k ti_32k_timer = {