clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c
index 456316f6c868..092ea664d2c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apb_timer.c
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ void apbt_setup_secondary_clock(void) {}
 static int apbt_clocksource_register(void)
 {
         u64 start, now;
-        cycle_t t1;
+        u64 t1;
 
         /* Start the counter, use timer 2 as source, timer 0/1 for event */
         dw_apb_clocksource_start(clocksource_apbt);
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ unsigned long apbt_quick_calibrate(void)
 {
         int i, scale;
         u64 old, new;
-        cycle_t t1, t2;
+        u64 t1, t2;
         unsigned long khz = 0;
         u32 loop, shift;