s390: remove all usages of PSW_ADDR_INSN

Yet another leftover from the 31 bit era. The usual operation
"y = x & PSW_ADDR_INSN" with the PSW_ADDR_INSN mask is a nop for
CONFIG_64BIT.

Therefore remove all usages and hope the code is a bit less confusing.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
index 95ed8d48f54e..791a4146052c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static inline void report_user_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, long signr)
                 return;
         printk(KERN_ALERT "User process fault: interruption code %04x ilc:%d ",
                regs->int_code & 0xffff, regs->int_code >> 17);
-        print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT "in ", regs->psw.addr & PSW_ADDR_INSN);
+        print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT "in ", regs->psw.addr);
         printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
         printk(KERN_ALERT "failing address: %016lx TEID: %016lx\n",
                regs->int_parm_long & __FAIL_ADDR_MASK, regs->int_parm_long);
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static noinline void do_no_context(struct pt_regs *regs)
         const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
 
         /* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault?  */
-        fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->psw.addr & PSW_ADDR_INSN);
+        fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->psw.addr);
         if (fixup) {
                 regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(fixup);
                 return;