clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
index 5e2e2218a402..56128da23c3a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
@@ -369,9 +369,9 @@ static bool use_gptimer_clksrc __initdata;
 /*
  * clocksource
  */
-static cycle_t clocksource_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 clocksource_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
 {
-        return (cycle_t)__omap_dm_timer_read_counter(&clksrc,
+        return (u64)__omap_dm_timer_read_counter(&clksrc,
                                                      OMAP_TIMER_NONPOSTED);
 }