Merge branch 'next-seccomp' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security

Pull seccomp updates from James Morris:

 - Add SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF

 - seccomp fixes for sparse warnings and s390 build (Tycho)

* 'next-seccomp' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security:
  seccomp, s390: fix build for syscall type change
  seccomp: fix poor type promotion
  samples: add an example of seccomp user trap
  seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace
  seccomp: switch system call argument type to void *
  seccomp: hoist struct seccomp_data recalculation higher

1 files changed, 84 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
index 82a468bc7560..b1b846d8a094 100644
--- a/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
+++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
@@ -122,6 +122,11 @@ In precedence order, they are:
         Results in the lower 16-bits of the return value being passed
         to userland as the errno without executing the system call.
 
+``SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF``:
+    Results in a ``struct seccomp_notif`` message sent on the userspace
+    notification fd, if it is attached, or ``-ENOSYS`` if it is not. See below
+    on discussion of how to handle user notifications.
+
 ``SECCOMP_RET_TRACE``:
         When returned, this value will cause the kernel to attempt to
         notify a ``ptrace()``-based tracer prior to executing the system
@@ -183,6 +188,85 @@ The ``samples/seccomp/`` directory contains both an x86-specific example
 and a more generic example of a higher level macro interface for BPF
 program generation.
 
+Userspace Notification
+======================
+
+The ``SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF`` return code lets seccomp filters pass a
+particular syscall to userspace to be handled. This may be useful for
+applications like container managers, which wish to intercept particular
+syscalls (``mount()``, ``finit_module()``, etc.) and change their behavior.
+
+To acquire a notification FD, use the ``SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER``
+argument to the ``seccomp()`` syscall:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+    fd = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER, &prog);
+
+which (on success) will return a listener fd for the filter, which can then be
+passed around via ``SCM_RIGHTS`` or similar. Note that filter fds correspond to
+a particular filter, and not a particular task. So if this task then forks,
+notifications from both tasks will appear on the same filter fd. Reads and
+writes to/from a filter fd are also synchronized, so a filter fd can safely
+have many readers.
+
+The interface for a seccomp notification fd consists of two structures:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+    struct seccomp_notif_sizes {
+        __u16 seccomp_notif;
+        __u16 seccomp_notif_resp;
+        __u16 seccomp_data;
+    };
+
+    struct seccomp_notif {
+        __u64 id;
+        __u32 pid;
+        __u32 flags;
+        struct seccomp_data data;
+    };
+
+    struct seccomp_notif_resp {
+        __u64 id;
+        __s64 val;
+        __s32 error;
+        __u32 flags;
+    };
+
+The ``struct seccomp_notif_sizes`` structure can be used to determine the size
+of the various structures used in seccomp notifications. The size of ``struct
+seccomp_data`` may change in the future, so code should use:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+    struct seccomp_notif_sizes sizes;
+    seccomp(SECCOMP_GET_NOTIF_SIZES, 0, &sizes);
+
+to determine the size of the various structures to allocate. See
+samples/seccomp/user-trap.c for an example.
+
+Users can read via ``ioctl(SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV)``  (or ``poll()``) on a
+seccomp notification fd to receive a ``struct seccomp_notif``, which contains
+five members: the input length of the structure, a unique-per-filter ``id``,
+the ``pid`` of the task which triggered this request (which may be 0 if the
+task is in a pid ns not visible from the listener's pid namespace), a ``flags``
+member which for now only has ``SECCOMP_NOTIF_FLAG_SIGNALED``, representing
+whether or not the notification is a result of a non-fatal signal, and the
+``data`` passed to seccomp. Userspace can then make a decision based on this
+information about what to do, and ``ioctl(SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND)`` a
+response, indicating what should be returned to userspace. The ``id`` member of
+``struct seccomp_notif_resp`` should be the same ``id`` as in ``struct
+seccomp_notif``.
+
+It is worth noting that ``struct seccomp_data`` contains the values of register
+arguments to the syscall, but does not contain pointers to memory. The task's
+memory is accessible to suitably privileged traces via ``ptrace()`` or
+``/proc/pid/mem``. However, care should be taken to avoid the TOCTOU mentioned
+above in this document: all arguments being read from the tracee's memory
+should be read into the tracer's memory before any policy decisions are made.
+This allows for an atomic decision on syscall arguments.
+
 Sysctls
 =======