remoteproc: use proper format-specifier for printing dma_addr_t

The dma_addr_t types can be printed properly using the %pad
printk format-specifier, there is no need to resort to the
unsigned long long type-casting to deal with different possible
type sizes.

Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 63fd365dec14..3a9982b8e8c2 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -236,8 +236,8 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i)
         }
         notifyid = ret;
 
-        dev_dbg(dev, "vring%d: va %p dma %llx size %x idr %d\n", i, va,
-                                (unsigned long long)dma, size, notifyid);
+        dev_dbg(dev, "vring%d: va %p dma %pad size %x idr %d\n",
+                i, va, &dma, size, notifyid);
 
         rvring->va = va;
         rvring->dma = dma;
@@ -594,8 +594,8 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
                 goto free_carv;
         }
 
-        dev_dbg(dev, "carveout va %p, dma %llx, len 0x%x\n", va,
-                                        (unsigned long long)dma, rsc->len);
+        dev_dbg(dev, "carveout va %p, dma %pad, len 0x%x\n",
+                va, &dma, rsc->len);
 
         /*
          * Ok, this is non-standard.
@@ -639,8 +639,8 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
                 mapping->len = rsc->len;
                 list_add_tail(&mapping->node, &rproc->mappings);
 
-                dev_dbg(dev, "carveout mapped 0x%x to 0x%llx\n",
-                                        rsc->da, (unsigned long long)dma);
+                dev_dbg(dev, "carveout mapped 0x%x to %pad\n",
+                        rsc->da, &dma);
         }
 
         /*