aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBoqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>2016-05-24 21:25:33 -0400
committerPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2016-06-14 19:03:31 -0400
commitaf06d4f74a7d2132c805339bfd5ab771b5706f42 (patch)
treef815d4b93b35ee2688b328b95d06603e11231b4e
parent5ef20f872d10c695c30ee036f11c687a23944158 (diff)
rcuperf: Don't treat gp_exp mis-setting as a WARN
0day found a boot warning triggered in rcu_perf_writer() on !SMP kernel: WARN_ON(rcu_gp_is_normal() && gp_exp); , the root cause of which is trying to measure expedited grace periods(by setting gp_exp to true by default) when all the grace periods are normal(TINY RCU only has normal grace periods). However, such a mis-setting would only result in failing to measure the performance for a specific kind of grace periods, therefore using a WARN_ON to check this is a little overkilling. We could handle this inside rcuperf module via some error messages to tell users about the mis-settings. Therefore this patch removes the WARN_ON in rcu_perf_writer() and handles those checkings in rcu_perf_init() with plain if() code. Moreover, this patch changes the default value of gp_exp to 1) align with rcutorture tests and 2) make the default setting work for all RCU implementations by default. Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Fixes: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/57411b10.mFvG0+AgcrMXGtcj%fengguang.wu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-rw-r--r--kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c14
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
index afd174e901c3..7b2dbdffd791 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>");
58#define VERBOSE_PERFOUT_ERRSTRING(s) \ 58#define VERBOSE_PERFOUT_ERRSTRING(s) \
59 do { if (verbose) pr_alert("%s" PERF_FLAG "!!! %s\n", perf_type, s); } while (0) 59 do { if (verbose) pr_alert("%s" PERF_FLAG "!!! %s\n", perf_type, s); } while (0)
60 60
61torture_param(bool, gp_exp, true, "Use expedited GP wait primitives"); 61torture_param(bool, gp_exp, false, "Use expedited GP wait primitives");
62torture_param(int, holdoff, 10, "Holdoff time before test start (s)"); 62torture_param(int, holdoff, 10, "Holdoff time before test start (s)");
63torture_param(int, nreaders, -1, "Number of RCU reader threads"); 63torture_param(int, nreaders, -1, "Number of RCU reader threads");
64torture_param(int, nwriters, -1, "Number of RCU updater threads"); 64torture_param(int, nwriters, -1, "Number of RCU updater threads");
@@ -358,8 +358,6 @@ rcu_perf_writer(void *arg)
358 u64 *wdpp = writer_durations[me]; 358 u64 *wdpp = writer_durations[me];
359 359
360 VERBOSE_PERFOUT_STRING("rcu_perf_writer task started"); 360 VERBOSE_PERFOUT_STRING("rcu_perf_writer task started");
361 WARN_ON(rcu_gp_is_expedited() && !rcu_gp_is_normal() && !gp_exp);
362 WARN_ON(rcu_gp_is_normal() && gp_exp);
363 WARN_ON(!wdpp); 361 WARN_ON(!wdpp);
364 set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(me % nr_cpu_ids)); 362 set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(me % nr_cpu_ids));
365 sp.sched_priority = 1; 363 sp.sched_priority = 1;
@@ -626,6 +624,16 @@ rcu_perf_init(void)
626 firsterr = -ENOMEM; 624 firsterr = -ENOMEM;
627 goto unwind; 625 goto unwind;
628 } 626 }
627 if (rcu_gp_is_expedited() && !rcu_gp_is_normal() && !gp_exp) {
628 VERBOSE_PERFOUT_ERRSTRING("All grace periods expedited, no normal ones to measure!");
629 firsterr = -EINVAL;
630 goto unwind;
631 }
632 if (rcu_gp_is_normal() && gp_exp) {
633 VERBOSE_PERFOUT_ERRSTRING("All grace periods normal, no expedited ones to measure!");
634 firsterr = -EINVAL;
635 goto unwind;
636 }
629 for (i = 0; i < nrealwriters; i++) { 637 for (i = 0; i < nrealwriters; i++) {
630 writer_durations[i] = 638 writer_durations[i] =
631 kcalloc(MAX_MEAS, sizeof(*writer_durations[i]), 639 kcalloc(MAX_MEAS, sizeof(*writer_durations[i]),