aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>2015-07-21 10:55:09 -0400
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2015-07-26 04:22:29 -0400
commit2c534c0da0a68418693e10ce1c4146e085f39518 (patch)
tree80be66b427193eded0ccbb93966d1c432f735adf
parent26ae19a3883c9d595e9100fd10b856a7cf1a949a (diff)
perf/x86/intel/cqm: Return cached counter value from IRQ context
Peter reported the following potential crash which I was able to reproduce with his test program, [ 148.765788] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 148.765796] WARNING: CPU: 34 PID: 2840 at kernel/smp.c:417 smp_call_function_many+0xb6/0x260() [ 148.765797] Modules linked in: [ 148.765800] CPU: 34 PID: 2840 Comm: perf Not tainted 4.2.0-rc1+ #4 [ 148.765803] ffffffff81cdc398 ffff88085f105950 ffffffff818bdfd5 0000000000000007 [ 148.765805] 0000000000000000 ffff88085f105990 ffffffff810e413a 0000000000000000 [ 148.765807] ffffffff82301080 0000000000000022 ffffffff8107f640 ffffffff8107f640 [ 148.765809] Call Trace: [ 148.765810] <NMI> [<ffffffff818bdfd5>] dump_stack+0x45/0x57 [ 148.765818] [<ffffffff810e413a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8a/0xc0 [ 148.765822] [<ffffffff8107f640>] ? intel_cqm_stable+0x60/0x60 [ 148.765824] [<ffffffff8107f640>] ? intel_cqm_stable+0x60/0x60 [ 148.765825] [<ffffffff810e422a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 148.765827] [<ffffffff811613f6>] smp_call_function_many+0xb6/0x260 [ 148.765829] [<ffffffff8107f640>] ? intel_cqm_stable+0x60/0x60 [ 148.765831] [<ffffffff81161748>] on_each_cpu_mask+0x28/0x60 [ 148.765832] [<ffffffff8107f6ef>] intel_cqm_event_count+0x7f/0xe0 [ 148.765836] [<ffffffff811cdd35>] perf_output_read+0x2a5/0x400 [ 148.765839] [<ffffffff811d2e5a>] perf_output_sample+0x31a/0x590 [ 148.765840] [<ffffffff811d333d>] ? perf_prepare_sample+0x26d/0x380 [ 148.765841] [<ffffffff811d3497>] perf_event_output+0x47/0x60 [ 148.765843] [<ffffffff811d36c5>] __perf_event_overflow+0x215/0x240 [ 148.765844] [<ffffffff811d4124>] perf_event_overflow+0x14/0x20 [ 148.765847] [<ffffffff8107e7f4>] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x1d4/0x440 [ 148.765849] [<ffffffff811d07a6>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x36/0xa0 [ 148.765853] [<ffffffff81219bad>] ? vunmap_page_range+0x19d/0x2f0 [ 148.765854] [<ffffffff81219d11>] ? unmap_kernel_range_noflush+0x11/0x20 [ 148.765859] [<ffffffff814ce6fe>] ? ghes_copy_tofrom_phys+0x11e/0x2a0 [ 148.765863] [<ffffffff8109e5db>] ? native_apic_msr_write+0x2b/0x30 [ 148.765865] [<ffffffff8109e44d>] ? x2apic_send_IPI_self+0x1d/0x20 [ 148.765869] [<ffffffff81065135>] ? arch_irq_work_raise+0x35/0x40 [ 148.765872] [<ffffffff811c8d86>] ? irq_work_queue+0x66/0x80 [ 148.765875] [<ffffffff81075306>] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x26/0x40 [ 148.765877] [<ffffffff81063ed9>] nmi_handle+0x79/0x100 [ 148.765879] [<ffffffff81064422>] default_do_nmi+0x42/0x100 [ 148.765880] [<ffffffff81064563>] do_nmi+0x83/0xb0 [ 148.765884] [<ffffffff818c7c0f>] end_repeat_nmi+0x1e/0x2e [ 148.765886] [<ffffffff811d07a6>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x36/0xa0 [ 148.765888] [<ffffffff811d07a6>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x36/0xa0 [ 148.765890] [<ffffffff811d07a6>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x36/0xa0 [ 148.765891] <<EOE>> [<ffffffff8110ab66>] finish_task_switch+0x156/0x210 [ 148.765898] [<ffffffff818c1671>] __schedule+0x341/0x920 [ 148.765899] [<ffffffff818c1c87>] schedule+0x37/0x80 [ 148.765903] [<ffffffff810ae1af>] ? do_page_fault+0x2f/0x80 [ 148.765905] [<ffffffff818c1f4a>] schedule_user+0x1a/0x50 [ 148.765907] [<ffffffff818c666c>] retint_careful+0x14/0x32 [ 148.765908] ---[ end trace e33ff2be78e14901 ]--- The CQM task events are not safe to be called from within interrupt context because they require performing an IPI to read the counter value on all sockets. And performing IPIs from within IRQ context is a "no-no". Make do with the last read counter value currently event in event->count when we're invoked in this context. Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@intel.com> Cc: Kanaka Juvva <kanaka.d.juvva@intel.com> Cc: Will Auld <will.auld@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1437490509-15373-1-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c8
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c
index 188076161c1b..63eb68b73589 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c
@@ -952,6 +952,14 @@ static u64 intel_cqm_event_count(struct perf_event *event)
952 return 0; 952 return 0;
953 953
954 /* 954 /*
955 * Getting up-to-date values requires an SMP IPI which is not
956 * possible if we're being called in interrupt context. Return
957 * the cached values instead.
958 */
959 if (unlikely(in_interrupt()))
960 goto out;
961
962 /*
955 * Notice that we don't perform the reading of an RMID 963 * Notice that we don't perform the reading of an RMID
956 * atomically, because we can't hold a spin lock across the 964 * atomically, because we can't hold a spin lock across the
957 * IPIs. 965 * IPIs.