irqchip: spear_shirq: Simplify chained handler

I don't know if there are less efficient ways to code that. Get rid of
the loop mess and use efficient code.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140619212713.662897061@linutronix.de
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/spear-shirq.c b/drivers/irqchip/spear-shirq.c
index 2a33129c4f4b..8521a7295b02 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/spear-shirq.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/spear-shirq.c
@@ -224,23 +224,20 @@ static void shirq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
         struct spear_shirq *shirq = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
         struct irq_data *idata = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
         struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(idata);
-        u32 i, j, val, mask;
+        u32 pend;
 
         chip->irq_ack(idata);
 
-        mask = shirq->mask;
-        while ((val = readl(shirq->base + shirq->regs.status_reg) &
-                                mask)) {
+        pend = readl(shirq->base + shirq->regs.status_reg) & shirq->mask;
+        pend >>= shirq->offset;
 
-                val >>= shirq->offset;
-                for (i = 0, j = 1; i < shirq->nr_irqs; i++, j <<= 1) {
+        while (pend) {
+                int irq = __ffs(pend);
 
-                        if (!(j & val))
-                                continue;
-
-                        generic_handle_irq(shirq->virq_base + i);
-                }
+                pend &= ~(0x1 << irq);
+                generic_handle_irq(shirq->virq_base + irq);
         }
+
         chip->irq_unmask(idata);
 }