sched/fair: Clean up scale confusion

Wanpeng noted that the scale_load_down() in calculate_imbalance() was
weird. I agree, it should be SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE, since we're going
to compare against busiest->group_capacity, which is in [capacity]
units.

Reported-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d28d89d774aa..23381056b4b5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7066,8 +7066,7 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
          */
         if (busiest->group_type == group_overloaded &&
             local->group_type   == group_overloaded) {
-                load_above_capacity = busiest->sum_nr_running *
-                                      scale_load_down(NICE_0_LOAD);
+                load_above_capacity = busiest->sum_nr_running * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
                 if (load_above_capacity > busiest->group_capacity)
                         load_above_capacity -= busiest->group_capacity;
                 else