[media] staging: solo6x10: fix | vs &

The test here is never true because '&' was used instead of '|'.  It was
the same as:

	if (status & ((1<<16) & (1<<17)) ...

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/solo6x10/i2c.c b/drivers/staging/media/solo6x10/i2c.c
index ef95a500b4da..398070a3d293 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/solo6x10/i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/solo6x10/i2c.c
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ int solo_i2c_isr(struct solo_dev *solo_dev)
 
         solo_reg_write(solo_dev, SOLO_IRQ_STAT, SOLO_IRQ_IIC);
 
-        if (status & (SOLO_IIC_STATE_TRNS & SOLO_IIC_STATE_SIG_ERR) ||
+        if (status & (SOLO_IIC_STATE_TRNS | SOLO_IIC_STATE_SIG_ERR) ||
             solo_dev->i2c_id < 0) {
                 solo_i2c_stop(solo_dev);
                 return -ENXIO;