aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>2016-09-22 17:00:29 -0400
committerJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>2016-10-10 09:06:37 -0400
commit17777d61f4a87d7b6d5585e8fdffa83773c594e7 (patch)
tree31118ba9f122692c02caf1b42c526a66c476cfae
parent6e7fdb873d6255ca3c999dd5c6c18962a769ed3e (diff)
drm/i915/kbl: KBL also needs to run the SAGV code
According to BSpec, it's the "core CPUs" that need the code, which means SKL and KBL, but not BXT. I don't have a KBL to test this patch on it. v2: Only SKL should have I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474578035-424-4-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com (cherry picked from commit 6e3100ec21e7c774a0fc01e36a1e0739530c2f71) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c14
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 1058729843fb..93ae27408e49 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2880,8 +2880,14 @@ skl_wm_plane_id(const struct intel_plane *plane)
2880static bool 2880static bool
2881intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) 2881intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
2882{ 2882{
2883 return IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && 2883 if (IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv))
2884 dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; 2884 return true;
2885
2886 if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) &&
2887 dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED)
2888 return true;
2889
2890 return false;
2885} 2891}
2886 2892
2887/* 2893/*
@@ -2919,7 +2925,7 @@ intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
2919 * Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular, 2925 * Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular,
2920 * don't actually have an SAGV. 2926 * don't actually have an SAGV.
2921 */ 2927 */
2922 if (ret == -ENXIO) { 2928 if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && ret == -ENXIO) {
2923 DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n"); 2929 DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n");
2924 dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; 2930 dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
2925 return 0; 2931 return 0;
@@ -2973,7 +2979,7 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
2973 * Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular, 2979 * Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular,
2974 * don't actually have an SAGV. 2980 * don't actually have an SAGV.
2975 */ 2981 */
2976 if (result == -ENXIO) { 2982 if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && result == -ENXIO) {
2977 DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n"); 2983 DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n");
2978 dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; 2984 dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
2979 return 0; 2985 return 0;