dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Remove redundant next_count from sba_request

The next_count in sba_request is redundant because same information
is captured by next_pending_count. This patch removes next_count
from sba_request.

Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
index 0f6467173986..d59a5fa2d202 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
@@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ struct sba_request {
         /* Chained requests management */
         struct sba_request *first;
         struct list_head next;
-        unsigned int next_count;
         atomic_t next_pending_count;
         /* BRCM message data */
         void *resp;
@@ -221,7 +220,6 @@ static struct sba_request *sba_alloc_request(struct sba_device *sba)
         req->flags = SBA_REQUEST_STATE_ALLOCED;
         req->first = req;
         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->next);
-        req->next_count = 1;
         atomic_set(&req->next_pending_count, 1);
 
         dma_async_tx_descriptor_init(&req->tx, &sba->dma_chan);
@@ -342,8 +340,7 @@ static void sba_chain_request(struct sba_request *first,
 
         list_add_tail(&req->next, &first->next);
         req->first = first;
-        first->next_count++;
-        atomic_set(&first->next_pending_count, first->next_count);
+        atomic_inc(&first->next_pending_count);
 
         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sba->reqs_lock, flags);
 }
@@ -1501,7 +1498,6 @@ static int sba_prealloc_channel_resources(struct sba_device *sba)
                 req->sba = sba;
                 req->flags = SBA_REQUEST_STATE_FREE;
                 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->next);
-                req->next_count = 1;
                 atomic_set(&req->next_pending_count, 0);
                 req->resp = sba->resp_base + p;
                 req->resp_dma = sba->resp_dma_base + p;