cpufreq: Use cpumask_copy instead of cpumask_or to copy a mask

->related_cpus is empty at this point of time and copying ->cpus to it
or orring ->related_cpus with ->cpus would result in the same value. But
cpumask_copy makes it rather clear.

Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 8701dc559850..16b9e811ff01 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
 
         if (new_policy) {
                 /* related_cpus should at least include policy->cpus. */
-                cpumask_or(policy->related_cpus, policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
+                cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
                 /* Remember CPUs present at the policy creation time. */
                 cpumask_and(policy->real_cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_present_mask);
         }