| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns 0 even in the case when the OPP
core doesn't know whether or not the table is shared. It works on the
majority of platforms, where the OPP table is never created before
invoking the function and then -ENODEV is returned by it.
But in the case of one platform (Jetson TK1) at least, the situation
is a bit different. The OPP table has been created (somehow) before
dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() is called and it returns 0. Its caller
treats that as 'the CPUs don't share OPPs' and that leads to degraded
performance.
Fix this by converting 'shared_opp' in struct opp_table to an enum
and making dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() return -EINVAL in case when
the value of that field is "access unknown", so that the caller can
handle it accordingly (cpufreq-dt considers that as 'all CPUs share
the table', for example).
Fixes: 6f707daa3833 "PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus()"
Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw : Subject & changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't
consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and
ifdef hackery makes it less readable.
Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF
is enabled.
Compile-tested:
- For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled
- For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately)
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Functions dev_pm_opp_of_{cpumask_,}remove_table removes/frees all the
static OPP entries associated with the device and/or all cpus(in case
of cpumask) that are created from DT.
However the OPP entries are populated reading from the firmware or some
different method using dev_pm_opp_add are marked dynamic and can't be
removed using above functions.
This patch adds non DT/OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table
to support the above mentioned usecase.
This is in preparation to make use of the same in scpi-cpufreq.c
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new use of dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus resulted in a harmless compiler
warning with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y:
drivers/cpufreq/mvebu-cpufreq.c: In function 'armada_xp_pmsu_cpufreq_init':
include/linux/cpumask.h:550:25: error: passing argument 2 of 'dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
The problem here is that cpumask_var_t gets passed by reference, but
by declaring a 'const cpumask_var_t' argument, only the pointer is
constant, not the actual mask. This is harmless because the function
does not actually modify the mask.
This patch changes the function prototypes for all of the related functions
to pass a 'struct cpumask *' instead of 'cpumask_var_t', matching what
most other such functions do in the kernel. This lets us mark all the
other similar functions as taking a 'const' mask where possible,
and it avoids the warning without any change in object code.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 947bd567f7a5 (mvebu: Use dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() to mark OPP tables as shared)
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OPP core allows a platform to mark OPP table as shared, when the
platform isn't using operating-points-v2 bindings.
And, so there should be a non DT way of finding out if the OPP table is
shared or not.
This patch adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(), which first tries to get
OPP sharing information from the opp-table (in case it is already marked
as shared), otherwise it uses the existing DT way of finding sharing
information.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() isn't supposed to update the cpumask
passed as its parameter, and so it should always have been marked
'const'.
Do it now.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
opp core allows OPPs to be explicitly marked as shared from platform
code, in case of operating-point v1 bindings.
Though we do everything fine in that case, we don't set the flag in the
opp-table to indicate that the OPPs are shared. It works fine today as
the flag isn't used anywhere else in the core, but we should be doing
the right thing by marking it set.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() towards the end of the file. This
is required for better readability after the next patch is applied,
which adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Few of the routines in cpu.c were missing these, add them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't send -EINVAL and propagate what's received from _find_opp_table().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stephen pointed out recently, that few structures always confuse him as
they aren't named properly. And this patch tries to address that:
Names are updated as:
- device_opp or dev_opp -> opp_table
- dev_opp_list -> opp_tables
- dev_opp_list_lock -> opp_table_lock
- device_list_opp -> opp_device (it was never a list, but a structure)
- list_dev -> opp_dev
- And similar changes in comments and function names as well.
This also fixes checkpatch warnings that were generated with this patch.
No functional changes.
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Set cpu_dev->id in cpumask first when setting up cpumask for CPUs that
share the same OPP table. This might be helpful when handling cpumask
without the original CPU bitfield set.
Signed-off-by: Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
dev_opp_list_lock is used everywhere to protect device and OPP lists,
but dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() is missed somehow. And instead we used
rcu-lock, which wouldn't help here as we are adding a new list_dev.
This also fixes a problem where we have called kzalloc(..., GFP_KERNEL)
from within rcu-lock, which isn't allowed as kzalloc can sleep when
called with GFP_KERNEL.
With CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP set, we get following lockdep-splat:
include/linux/rcupdate.h:578 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
5 locks held by swapper/0/1:
#0: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02f68f4>] __driver_attach+0x48/0x98
#1: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c02f6904>] __driver_attach+0x58/0x98
#2: (cpu_hotplug.lock){++++++}, at: [<c00249d0>] get_online_cpus+0x40/0xb0
#3: (subsys mutex#5){+.+.+.}, at: [<c02f4f8c>] subsys_interface_register+0x44/0xdc
#4: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [<c0305c80>] dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus+0x0/0x1e4
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 4.3.0-rc7-00047-g81f5932958a8 #59
Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
[<c0016874>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c001355c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c001355c>] (show_stack) from [<c022553c>] (dump_stack+0x94/0xbc)
[<c022553c>] (dump_stack) from [<c004904c>] (___might_sleep+0x24c/0x298)
[<c004904c>] (___might_sleep) from [<c00f07e4>] (kmem_cache_alloc+0xe8/0x164)
[<c00f07e4>] (kmem_cache_alloc) from [<c0305354>] (_add_list_dev+0x30/0x58)
[<c0305354>] (_add_list_dev) from [<c0305d50>] (dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus+0xd0/0x1e4)
[<c0305d50>] (dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus) from [<c040eda4>] (cpufreq_init+0x4cc/0x62c)
[<c040eda4>] (cpufreq_init) from [<c040a964>] (cpufreq_online+0xbc/0x73c)
[<c040a964>] (cpufreq_online) from [<c02f4fe0>] (subsys_interface_register+0x98/0xdc)
[<c02f4fe0>] (subsys_interface_register) from [<c040a640>] (cpufreq_register_driver+0x110/0x17c)
[<c040a640>] (cpufreq_register_driver) from [<c040ef64>] (dt_cpufreq_probe+0x60/0x8c)
[<c040ef64>] (dt_cpufreq_probe) from [<c02f8084>] (platform_drv_probe+0x44/0xa4)
[<c02f8084>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c02f67c0>] (driver_probe_device+0x208/0x2f4)
[<c02f67c0>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c02f6940>] (__driver_attach+0x94/0x98)
[<c02f6940>] (__driver_attach) from [<c02f4c1c>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0x9c)
Reported-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: 4.3 <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We are returning 0 even in case of errors, fix it.
Fixes: 8d4d4e98acd6 ("PM / OPP: Add helpers for initializing CPU OPPs")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: 4.3 <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To identify OPP core's print messages easily, prefix them with
KBUILD_MODNAME.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The code was using PTR_ERR(NULL) which causes a static checker warning.
I have fixed up the printks and changed the return to -ENOENT.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move cpu device specific code out of generic opp library, and add it to
cpu.c.
Along with that, create a core-internal opp.h header, which will be used
to share structures and function prototypes within opp core.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
|
OPP code is expanding and is already present in multiple directories
(cpufreq and power). Lets move it to its own directory, to manage it
better.
This also moves/renames the cpufreq_opp file to cpu.c, as it will
contain helpers for cpu device. Its not just about cpufreq, other
frameworks can use OPPs as well.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
