mm/page_alloc.c: fix a misleading comment

The comment says that the per-cpu batchsize and zone watermarks are
determined by present_pages which is definitely wrong, they are both
calculated from managed_pages.  Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index bdaa0cf8fd41..59abb47b70ee 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -6022,7 +6022,7 @@ void __init mem_init_print_info(const char *str)
  * set_dma_reserve - set the specified number of pages reserved in the first zone
  * @new_dma_reserve: The number of pages to mark reserved
  *
- * The per-cpu batchsize and zone watermarks are determined by present_pages.
+ * The per-cpu batchsize and zone watermarks are determined by managed_pages.
  * In the DMA zone, a significant percentage may be consumed by kernel image
  * and other unfreeable allocations which can skew the watermarks badly. This
  * function may optionally be used to account for unfreeable pages in the