jbd2: speedup jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()

It is often the case that we mark buffer as having dirty metadata when
the buffer is already in that state (frequent for bitmaps, inode table
blocks, superblock). Thus it is unnecessary to contend on grabbing
journal head reference and bh_state lock. Avoid that by checking whether
any modification to the buffer is needed before grabbing any locks or
references.

[ Note: this is a fixed version of commit 2143c1965a761, which was
  reverted in ebeaa8ddb3663b5 due to a false positive triggering of an
  assertion check. -- Ted ]

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

1 files changed, 32 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index f3d06174b051..a6eec9747c74 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -1280,8 +1280,6 @@ void jbd2_buffer_abort_trigger(struct journal_head *jh,
         triggers->t_abort(triggers, jh2bh(jh));
 }
 
-
-
 /**
  * int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() -  mark a buffer as containing dirty metadata
  * @handle: transaction to add buffer to.
@@ -1314,12 +1312,41 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
 
         if (is_handle_aborted(handle))
                 return -EROFS;
-        journal = transaction->t_journal;
-        jh = jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head(bh);
-        if (!jh) {
+        if (!buffer_jbd(bh)) {
                 ret = -EUCLEAN;
                 goto out;
         }
+        /*
+         * We don't grab jh reference here since the buffer must be part
+         * of the running transaction.
+         */
+        jh = bh2jh(bh);
+        /*
+         * This and the following assertions are unreliable since we may see jh
+         * in inconsistent state unless we grab bh_state lock. But this is
+         * crucial to catch bugs so let's do a reliable check until the
+         * lockless handling is fully proven.
+         */
+        if (jh->b_transaction != transaction &&
+            jh->b_next_transaction != transaction) {
+                jbd_lock_bh_state(bh);
+                J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction == transaction ||
+                                jh->b_next_transaction == transaction);
+                jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
+        }
+        if (jh->b_modified == 1) {
+                /* If it's in our transaction it must be in BJ_Metadata list. */
+                if (jh->b_transaction == transaction &&
+                    jh->b_jlist != BJ_Metadata) {
+                        jbd_lock_bh_state(bh);
+                        J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction != transaction ||
+                                        jh->b_jlist == BJ_Metadata);
+                        jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
+                }
+                goto out;
+        }
+
+        journal = transaction->t_journal;
         jbd_debug(5, "journal_head %p\n", jh);
         JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
 
@@ -1410,7 +1437,6 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
         spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 out_unlock_bh:
         jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
-        jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh);
 out:
         JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "exit");
         return ret;