litmus2008.git/net/ipv4, branch master

[INET]: Fix truesize setting in ip_append_data

2008-01-23T11:11:43+00:00

As it is ip_append_data only counts page fragments to the skb that
allocated it.  As such it means that the first skb gets hit with a
4K charge even though it might have only used a fraction of it while
all subsequent skb's that use the same page gets away with no charge
at all.

This bug was exposed by the UDP accounting patch.

[ The wmem_alloc bumping needs to be moved with the truesize,
  noticed by Takahiro Yasui.  -DaveM ]

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

[IPV4]: Add missing skb->truesize increment in ip_append_page().

2008-01-23T11:11:40+00:00

And as noted by Takahiro Yasui, we thus need to bump the
sk->sk_wmem_alloc at this spot as well.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

[ICMP]: ICMP_MIB_OUTMSGS increment duplicated

2008-01-21T11:39:45+00:00

Commit "96793b482540f3a26e2188eaf75cb56b7829d3e3" (Add ICMPMsgStats
MIB (RFC 4293)) made a mistake.

In that patch, David L added a icmp_out_count() in
ip_push_pending_frames(), remove icmp_out_count() from
icmp_reply(). But he forgot to remove icmp_out_count() from
icmp_send() too.  Since icmp_send and icmp_reply will call
icmp_push_reply, which will call ip_push_pending_frames, a duplicated
increment happened in icmp_send.

This patch remove the icmp_out_count from icmp_send too.

Signed-off-by: Wang Chen 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

[IPV4] FIB_HASH : Avoid unecessary loop in fn_hash_dump_zone()

2008-01-21T04:31:39+00:00

I noticed "ip route list" was slower than "cat /proc/net/route" on a
machine with a full Internet routing table (214392 entries : Special
thanks to Robert ;) )

This is similar to problem reported in commit
d8c9283089287341c85a0a69de32c2287a990e71 ("[IPV4] ROUTE: ip_rt_dump()
is unecessary slow")

Fix is to avoid scanning the begining of fz_hash table, but directly
seek to the right offset.

Before patch :

time ip route >/tmp/ROUTE

real    0m1.285s
user    0m0.712s
sys     0m0.436s

After patch

# time ip route >/tmp/ROUTE

real    0m0.835s
user    0m0.692s
sys     0m0.124s

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

[IPV4] fib_trie: fix duplicated route issue

2008-01-21T04:31:38+00:00

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9493

The fib allows making identical routes with 'ip route replace'.
This patch makes the fib return -EEXIST if replacement would cause duplication.

Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

[IPV4] fib_hash: fix duplicated route issue

2008-01-21T04:31:37+00:00

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9493

The fib allows making identical routes with 'ip route replace'.
This patch makes the fib return -EEXIST if replacement would cause duplication.

Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

[IPV4] ROUTE: fix rcu_dereference() uses in /proc/net/rt_cache

2008-01-10T11:55:57+00:00

In rt_cache_get_next(), no need to guard seq->private by a
rcu_dereference() since seq is private to the thread running this
function. Reading seq.private once (as guaranted bu rcu_dereference())
or several time if compiler really is dumb enough wont change the
result.

But we miss real spots where rcu_dereference() are needed, both in
rt_cache_get_first() and rt_cache_get_next()

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

[LRO] Fix lro_mgr->features checks

2008-01-09T07:30:18+00:00

lro_mgr->features contains a bitmask of LRO_F_* values which are
defined as power of two, not as bit indexes.
They must be checked with x&LRO_F_FOO, not with test_bit(LRO_F_FOO,&x).

Signed-off-by: Brice Goglin 
Acked-by: Andrew Gallatin 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

[IPV4] ROUTE: ip_rt_dump() is unecessary slow

2008-01-09T07:30:16+00:00

I noticed "ip route list cache x.y.z.t" can be *very* slow.

While strace-ing -T it I also noticed that first part of route cache
is fetched quite fast :

recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"p\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\202
GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\2\0\2\0"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3772 <0.000047>
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"\234\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\
202GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\1\0\2"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3736 <0.000042>
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"\204\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\
202GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\1\0\2"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3740 <0.000055>
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"\234\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\
202GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\1\0\2"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3712 <0.000043>
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"\204\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\
202GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\1\0\2"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3732 <0.000053>
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"p\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\202
GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\2\0\2\0"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3708 <0.000052>
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"p\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\202
GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\2\0\2\0"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3680 <0.000041>

while the part at the end of the table is more expensive:

recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"\204\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\202GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\1\0\2"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3656 <0.003857>
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"\204\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\202GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\1\0\2"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3772 <0.003891>
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"p\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\202GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\2\0\2\0"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3712 <0.003765>
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"p\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\202GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\2\0\2\0"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3700 <0.003879>
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"p\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\202GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\2\0\2\0"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3676 <0.003797>
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"p\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\202GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\2\0\2\0"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3724 <0.003856>
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, pid=0, groups=00000000}, msg_iov(1)=[{"\234\0\0\0\30\0\2\0\254i\202GXm\0\0\2  \0\376\0\0\1\0\2"..., 16384}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 3736 <0.003848>

The following patch corrects this performance/latency problem,
removing quadratic behavior.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

[IPV4] ipconfig: Fix regression in ip command line processing

2008-01-09T07:29:58+00:00

The recent changes for ip command line processing fixed some problems
but unfortunately broke some common usage scenarios.  In current
2.6.24-rc6 the following command line results in no IP address
assignment, which is surely a regression:

 ip=10.0.2.15::10.0.2.2:255.255.255.0::eth0:off

Please find below a patch that works for all cases I can find.

Signed-off-by: Amos Waterland 
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller