/* Copyright (c) 2011-2014 PLUMgrid, http://plumgrid.com * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public * License as published by the Free Software Foundation. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU * General Public License for more details. */ #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include /* bpf_check() is a static code analyzer that walks eBPF program * instruction by instruction and updates register/stack state. * All paths of conditional branches are analyzed until 'bpf_exit' insn. * * The first pass is depth-first-search to check that the program is a DAG. * It rejects the following programs: * - larger than BPF_MAXINSNS insns * - if loop is present (detected via back-edge) * - unreachable insns exist (shouldn't be a forest. program = one function) * - out of bounds or malformed jumps * The second pass is all possible path descent from the 1st insn. * Since it's analyzing all pathes through the program, the length of the * analysis is limited to 32k insn, which may be hit even if total number of * insn is less then 4K, but there are too many branches that change stack/regs. * Number of 'branches to be analyzed' is limited to 1k * * On entry to each instruction, each register has a type, and the instruction * changes the types of the registers depending on instruction semantics. * If instruction is BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_5), then type of R5 is * copied to R1. * * All registers are 64-bit. * R0 - return register * R1-R5 argument passing registers * R6-R9 callee saved registers * R10 - frame pointer read-only * * At the start of BPF program the register R1 contains a pointer to bpf_context * and has type PTR_TO_CTX. * * Verifier tracks arithmetic operations on pointers in case: * BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10), * BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -20), * 1st insn copies R10 (which has FRAME_PTR) type into R1 * and 2nd arithmetic instruction is pattern matched to recognize * that it wants to construct a pointer to some element within stack. * So after 2nd insn, the register R1 has type PTR_TO_STACK * (and -20 constant is saved for further stack bounds checking). * Meaning that this reg is a pointer to stack plus known immediate constant. * * Most of the time the registers have UNKNOWN_VALUE type, which * means the register has some value, but it's not a valid pointer. * (like pointer plus pointer becomes UNKNOWN_VALUE type) * * When verifier sees load or store instructions the type of base register * can be: PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, PTR_TO_CTX, FRAME_PTR. These are three pointer * types recognized by check_mem_access() function. * * PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE means that this register is pointing to 'map element value' * and the range of [ptr, ptr + map's value_size) is accessible. * * registers used to pass values to function calls are checked against * function argument constraints. * * ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY is one of such argument constraints. * It means that the register type passed to this function must be * PTR_TO_STACK and it will be used inside the function as * 'pointer to map element key' * * For example the argument constraints for bpf_map_lookup_elem(): * .ret_type = RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL, * .arg1_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR, * .arg2_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY, * * ret_type says that this function returns 'pointer to map elem value or null' * function expects 1st argument to be a const pointer to 'struct bpf_map' and * 2nd argument should be a pointer to stack, which will be used inside * the helper function as a pointer to map element key. * * On the kernel side the helper function looks like: * u64 bpf_map_lookup_elem(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5) * { * struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *) (unsigned long) r1; * void *key = (void *) (unsigned long) r2; * void *value; * * here kernel can access 'key' and 'map' pointers safely, knowing that * [key, key + map->key_size) bytes are valid and were initialized on * the stack of eBPF program. * } * * Corresponding eBPF program may look like: * BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), // after this insn R2 type is FRAME_PTR * BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4), // after this insn R2 type is PTR_TO_STACK * BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, map_fd), // after this insn R1 type is CONST_PTR_TO_MAP * BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), * here verifier looks at prototype of map_lookup_elem() and sees: * .arg1_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR and R1->type == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP, which is ok, * Now verifier knows that this map has key of R1->map_ptr->key_size bytes * * Then .arg2_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY and R2->type == PTR_TO_STACK, ok so far, * Now verifier checks that [R2, R2 + map's key_size) are within stack limits * and were initialized prior to this call. * If it's ok, then verifier allows this BPF_CALL insn and looks at * .ret_type which is RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL, so it sets * R0->type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL which means bpf_map_lookup_elem() function * returns ether pointer to map value or NULL. * * When type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL passes through 'if (reg != 0) goto +off' * insn, the register holding that pointer in the true branch changes state to * PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE and the same register changes state to CONST_IMM in the false * branch. See check_cond_jmp_op(). * * After the call R0 is set to return type of the function and registers R1-R5 * are set to NOT_INIT to indicate that they are no longer readable. */ /* single container for all structs * one verifier_env per bpf_check() call */ struct verifier_env { }; /* verbose verifier prints what it's seeing * bpf_check() is called under lock, so no race to access these global vars */ static u32 log_level, log_size, log_len; static char *log_buf; static DEFINE_MUTEX(bpf_verifier_lock); /* log_level controls verbosity level of eBPF verifier. * verbose() is used to dump the verification trace to the log, so the user * can figure out what's wrong with the program */ static void verbose(const char *fmt, ...) { va_list args; if (log_level == 0 || log_len >= log_size - 1) return; va_start(args, fmt); log_len += vscnprintf(log_buf + log_len, log_size - log_len, fmt, args); va_end(args); } static const char *const bpf_class_string[] = { [BPF_LD] = "ld", [BPF_LDX] = "ldx", [BPF_ST] = "st", [BPF_STX] = "stx", [BPF_ALU] = "alu", [BPF_JMP] = "jmp", [BPF_RET] = "BUG", [BPF_ALU64] = "alu64", }; static const char *const bpf_alu_string[] = { [BPF_ADD >> 4] = "+=", [BPF_SUB >> 4] = "-=", [BPF_MUL >> 4] = "*=", [BPF_DIV >> 4] = "/=", [BPF_OR >> 4] = "|=", [BPF_AND >> 4] = "&=", [BPF_LSH >> 4] = "<<=", [BPF_RSH >> 4] = ">>=", [BPF_NEG >> 4] = "neg", [BPF_MOD >> 4] = "%=", [BPF_XOR >> 4] = "^=", [BPF_MOV >> 4] = "=", [BPF_ARSH >> 4] = "s>>=", [BPF_END >> 4] = "endian", }; static const char *const bpf_ldst_string[] = { [BPF_W >> 3] = "u32", [BPF_H >> 3] = "u16", [BPF_B >> 3] = "u8", [BPF_DW >> 3] = "u64", }; static const char *const bpf_jmp_string[] = { [BPF_JA >> 4] = "jmp", [BPF_JEQ >> 4] = "==", [BPF_JGT >> 4] = ">", [BPF_JGE >> 4] = ">=", [BPF_JSET >> 4] = "&", [BPF_JNE >> 4] = "!=", [BPF_JSGT >> 4] = "s>", [BPF_JSGE >> 4] = "s>=", [BPF_CALL >> 4] = "call", [BPF_EXIT >> 4] = "exit", }; static void print_bpf_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn) { u8 class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code); if (class == BPF_ALU || class == BPF_ALU64) { if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %sr%d\n", insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", insn->dst_reg, bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", insn->src_reg); else verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %s%d\n", insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", insn->dst_reg, bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", insn->imm); } else if (class == BPF_STX) { if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM) verbose("(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = r%d\n", insn->code, bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], insn->dst_reg, insn->off, insn->src_reg); else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_XADD) verbose("(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) += r%d\n", insn->code, bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], insn->dst_reg, insn->off, insn->src_reg); else verbose("BUG_%02x\n", insn->code); } else if (class == BPF_ST) { if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) { verbose("BUG_st_%02x\n", insn->code); return; } verbose("(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = %d\n", insn->code, bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], insn->dst_reg, insn->off, insn->imm); } else if (class == BPF_LDX) { if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) { verbose("BUG_ldx_%02x\n", insn->code); return; } verbose("(%02x) r%d = *(%s *)(r%d %+d)\n", insn->code, insn->dst_reg, bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], insn->src_reg, insn->off); } else if (class == BPF_LD) { if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ABS) { verbose("(%02x) r0 = *(%s *)skb[%d]\n", insn->code, bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], insn->imm); } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_IND) { verbose("(%02x) r0 = *(%s *)skb[r%d + %d]\n", insn->code, bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], insn->src_reg, insn->imm); } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_IMM) { verbose("(%02x) r%d = 0x%x\n", insn->code, insn->dst_reg, insn->imm); } else { verbose("BUG_ld_%02x\n", insn->code); return; } } else if (class == BPF_JMP) { u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); if (opcode == BPF_CALL) { verbose("(%02x) call %d\n", insn->code, insn->imm); } else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_JA)) { verbose("(%02x) goto pc%+d\n", insn->code, insn->off); } else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT)) { verbose("(%02x) exit\n", insn->code); } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { verbose("(%02x) if r%d %s r%d goto pc%+d\n", insn->code, insn->dst_reg, bpf_jmp_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], insn->src_reg, insn->off); } else { verbose("(%02x) if r%d %s 0x%x goto pc%+d\n", insn->code, insn->dst_reg, bpf_jmp_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], insn->imm, insn->off); } } else { verbose("(%02x) %s\n", insn->code, bpf_class_string[class]); } } int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr) { char __user *log_ubuf = NULL; struct verifier_env *env; int ret = -EINVAL; if (prog->len <= 0 || prog->len > BPF_MAXINSNS) return -E2BIG; /* 'struct verifier_env' can be global, but since it's not small, * allocate/free it every time bpf_check() is called */ env = kzalloc(sizeof(struct verifier_env), GFP_KERNEL); if (!env) return -ENOMEM; /* grab the mutex to protect few globals used by verifier */ mutex_lock(&bpf_verifier_lock); if (attr->log_level || attr->log_buf || attr->log_size) { /* user requested verbose verifier output * and supplied buffer to store the verification trace */ log_level = attr->log_level; log_ubuf = (char __user *) (unsigned long) attr->log_buf; log_size = attr->log_size; log_len = 0; ret = -EINVAL; /* log_* values have to be sane */ if (log_size < 128 || log_size > UINT_MAX >> 8 || log_level == 0 || log_ubuf == NULL) goto free_env; ret = -ENOMEM; log_buf = vmalloc(log_size); if (!log_buf) goto free_env; } else { log_level = 0; } /* ret = do_check(env); */ if (log_level && log_len >= log_size - 1) { BUG_ON(log_len >= log_size); /* verifier log exceeded user supplied buffer */ ret = -ENOSPC; /* fall through to return what was recorded */ } /* copy verifier log back to user space including trailing zero */ if (log_level && copy_to_user(log_ubuf, log_buf, log_len + 1) != 0) { ret = -EFAULT; goto free_log_buf; } free_log_buf: if (log_level) vfree(log_buf); free_env: kfree(env); mutex_unlock(&bpf_verifier_lock); return ret; }