From 0bebc633f1428163c9659fd16b34c745e60a0757 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NeilBrown Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:53:42 +1000 Subject: sunrpc: Don't schedule an upcall on a replaced cache entry. When a cache entry is replaced, the "expiry_time" get set to zero by a call to "cache_fresh_locked(..., 0)" at the end of "sunrpc_cache_update". This low expiry time makes cache_check() think that the 'refresh_age' is negative, so the 'age' is comparatively large and a refresh is triggered. However refreshing a replaced entry it pointless, it cannot achieve anything useful. So teach cache_check to ignore a low refresh_age when expiry_time is zero. Reported-by: Bodo Stroesser Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields --- net/sunrpc/cache.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net') diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c index 5478a015ab00..49eb37010aa3 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c @@ -262,7 +262,8 @@ int cache_check(struct cache_detail *detail, if (rqstp == NULL) { if (rv == -EAGAIN) rv = -ENOENT; - } else if (rv == -EAGAIN || age > refresh_age/2) { + } else if (rv == -EAGAIN || + (h->expiry_time != 0 && age > refresh_age/2)) { dprintk("RPC: Want update, refage=%ld, age=%ld\n", refresh_age, age); if (!test_and_set_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &h->flags)) { -- cgit v1.2.2