From 03147dfc8a3756439f0cc54aa181f30067f1b21b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Berg Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:39:28 +0100 Subject: mac80211: fix kmalloc vs. net_ratelimit The "goto end;" part definitely must not be rate limited. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg Signed-off-by: John W. Linville --- net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/mac80211') diff --git a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c index 2019b4f0528d..9aeed5320228 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c +++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c @@ -1116,9 +1116,10 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_process_addba_request(struct net_device *dev, /* prepare reordering buffer */ tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf = kmalloc(buf_size * sizeof(struct sk_buf *), GFP_ATOMIC); - if ((!tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf) && net_ratelimit()) { - printk(KERN_ERR "can not allocate reordering buffer " - "to tid %d\n", tid); + if (!tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf) { + if (net_ratelimit()) + printk(KERN_ERR "can not allocate reordering buffer " + "to tid %d\n", tid); goto end; } memset(tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf, 0, -- cgit v1.2.2