From ae31c3399d17b1f7bc1742724f70476b5417744f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 00:17:51 -0700 Subject: [DCCP]: Move the ack vector code to net/dccp/ackvec.[ch] Isolating it, that will be used when we introduce a CCID2 (TCP-Like) implementation. Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/dccp/input.c | 69 +++++++++++--------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/dccp/input.c') diff --git a/net/dccp/input.c b/net/dccp/input.c index 062e9f8359d0..1b6b2cb12376 100644 --- a/net/dccp/input.c +++ b/net/dccp/input.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include +#include "ackvec.h" #include "ccid.h" #include "dccp.h" @@ -60,8 +61,8 @@ static inline void dccp_event_ack_recv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) struct dccp_sock *dp = dccp_sk(sk); if (dp->dccps_options.dccpo_send_ack_vector) - dccp_ackpkts_check_rcv_ackno(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackpkts, sk, - DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_ack_seq); + dccp_ackvec_check_rcv_ackno(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec, sk, + DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_ack_seq); } static int dccp_check_seqno(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) @@ -164,37 +165,11 @@ int dccp_rcv_established(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, if (DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_ack_seq != DCCP_PKT_WITHOUT_ACK_SEQ) dccp_event_ack_recv(sk, skb); - /* - * FIXME: check ECN to see if we should use - * DCCP_ACKPKTS_STATE_ECN_MARKED - */ - if (dp->dccps_options.dccpo_send_ack_vector) { - struct dccp_ackpkts *ap = dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackpkts; - - if (dccp_ackpkts_add(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackpkts, sk, - DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq, - DCCP_ACKPKTS_STATE_RECEIVED)) { - LIMIT_NETDEBUG(KERN_WARNING "DCCP: acknowledgeable " - "packets buffer full!\n"); - ap->dccpap_ack_seqno = DCCP_MAX_SEQNO + 1; - inet_csk_schedule_ack(sk); - inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer(sk, ICSK_TIME_DACK, - TCP_DELACK_MIN, - DCCP_RTO_MAX); - goto discard; - } - - /* - * FIXME: this activation is probably wrong, have to study more - * TCP delack machinery and how it fits into DCCP draft, but - * for now it kinda "works" 8) - */ - if (!inet_csk_ack_scheduled(sk)) { - inet_csk_schedule_ack(sk); - inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer(sk, ICSK_TIME_DACK, 5 * HZ, - DCCP_RTO_MAX); - } - } + if (dp->dccps_options.dccpo_send_ack_vector && + dccp_ackvec_add(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec, sk, + DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq, + DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_RECEIVED)) + goto discard; ccid_hc_rx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid, sk, skb); ccid_hc_tx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk, skb); @@ -495,29 +470,11 @@ int dccp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, ccid_hc_rx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid, sk, skb); ccid_hc_tx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk, skb); - /* - * FIXME: check ECN to see if we should use - * DCCP_ACKPKTS_STATE_ECN_MARKED - */ - if (dp->dccps_options.dccpo_send_ack_vector) { - if (dccp_ackpkts_add(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackpkts, sk, - dcb->dccpd_seq, - DCCP_ACKPKTS_STATE_RECEIVED)) - goto discard; - /* - * FIXME: this activation is probably wrong, have to - * study more TCP delack machinery and how it fits into - * DCCP draft, but for now it kinda "works" 8) - */ - if ((dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackpkts->dccpap_ack_seqno == - DCCP_MAX_SEQNO + 1) && - !inet_csk_ack_scheduled(sk)) { - inet_csk_schedule_ack(sk); - inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer(sk, ICSK_TIME_DACK, - TCP_DELACK_MIN, - DCCP_RTO_MAX); - } - } + if (dp->dccps_options.dccpo_send_ack_vector && + dccp_ackvec_add(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec, sk, + DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq, + DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_RECEIVED)) + goto discard; } /* -- cgit v1.2.2