From 39a2eddb9b62959dc55c6978b5eaeb3dd57c5ff2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:35:54 -0400 Subject: genirq: fix comment to say IRQ_WAKE_THREAD Trying to implement a driver to use threaded irqs, I was confused when the return value to use that was described in the comment above request_threaded_irq was not defined. Turns out that the enum is IRQ_WAKE_THREAD where as the comment said IRQ_THREAD_WAKE. [Impact: do not confuse developers with wrong comments ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt LKML-Reference: Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c index 2734eca59243..eb47f8b80557 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_irq); * still called in hard interrupt context and has to check * whether the interrupt originates from the device. If yes it * needs to disable the interrupt on the device and return - * IRQ_THREAD_WAKE which will wake up the handler thread and run + * IRQ_WAKE_THREAD which will wake up the handler thread and run * @thread_fn. This split handler design is necessary to support * shared interrupts. * -- cgit v1.2.2