From 17cf22c33e1f1b5e435469c84e43872579497653 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:51:53 -0800 Subject: pidns: Use task_active_pid_ns where appropriate The expressions tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns and task_active_pid_ns aka ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) should have the same number of cache line misses with the practical difference that ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) is released later in a processes life. Furthermore by using task_active_pid_ns it becomes trivial to write an unshare implementation for the the pid namespace. So I have used task_active_pid_ns everywhere I can. In fork since the pid has not yet been attached to the process I use ns_of_pid, to achieve the same effect. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman --- kernel/sysctl_binary.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/sysctl_binary.c') diff --git a/kernel/sysctl_binary.c b/kernel/sysctl_binary.c index 65bdcf198d4e..5a6384450501 100644 --- a/kernel/sysctl_binary.c +++ b/kernel/sysctl_binary.c @@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ static ssize_t binary_sysctl(const int *name, int nlen, goto out_putname; } - mnt = current->nsproxy->pid_ns->proc_mnt; + mnt = task_active_pid_ns(current)->proc_mnt; file = file_open_root(mnt->mnt_root, mnt, pathname, flags); result = PTR_ERR(file); if (IS_ERR(file)) -- cgit v1.2.2