From 10ab825bdef8df510f99c703a5a2d9b13a4e31a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Nesterov Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 02:34:37 -0700 Subject: change kernel threads to ignore signals instead of blocking them Currently kernel threads use sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK) to protect against signals. This doesn't prevent the signal delivery, this only blocks signal_wake_up(). Every "killall -33 kthreadd" means a "struct siginfo" leak. Change kthreadd_setup() to set all handlers to SIG_IGN instead of blocking them (make a new helper ignore_signals() for that). If the kernel thread needs some signal, it should use allow_signal() anyway, and in that case it should not use CLONE_SIGHAND. Note that we can't change daemonize() (should die!) in the same way, because it can be used along with CLONE_SIGHAND. This means that allow_signal() still should unblock the signal to work correctly with daemonize()ed threads. However, disallow_signal() doesn't block the signal any longer but ignores it. NOTE: with or without this patch the kernel threads are not protected from handle_stop_signal(), this seems harmless, but not good. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/signal.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel/signal.c') diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 23ae6d62fc41..2ac3a668d9dd 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -209,6 +209,16 @@ void flush_signals(struct task_struct *t) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sighand->siglock, flags); } +void ignore_signals(struct task_struct *t) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < _NSIG; ++i) + t->sighand->action[i].sa.sa_handler = SIG_IGN; + + flush_signals(t); +} + /* * Flush all handlers for a task. */ -- cgit v1.2.2