From 34d0ed5ea7a72d5961552fb1758a94f0d3f8f3dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Nesterov Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:20:13 +0100 Subject: lockdep: Change mark_held_locks() to check hlock->check instead of lockdep_no_validate The __lockdep_no_validate check in mark_held_locks() adds the subtle and (afaics) unnecessary difference between no-validate and check==0. And this looks even more inconsistent because __lock_acquire() skips mark_irqflags()->mark_lock() if !check. Change mark_held_locks() to check hlock->check instead. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Dave Jones Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul McKenney Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Alan Stern Cc: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140120182013.GA26505@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/locking/lockdep.c') diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index f7eba92cb97c..bf0c6b0dd9c5 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -2517,7 +2517,7 @@ mark_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr, enum mark_type mark) BUG_ON(usage_bit >= LOCK_USAGE_STATES); - if (hlock_class(hlock)->key == __lockdep_no_validate__.subkeys) + if (!hlock->check) continue; if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, usage_bit)) -- cgit v1.2.2