From 17cf22c33e1f1b5e435469c84e43872579497653 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:51:53 -0800 Subject: pidns: Use task_active_pid_ns where appropriate The expressions tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns and task_active_pid_ns aka ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) should have the same number of cache line misses with the practical difference that ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) is released later in a processes life. Furthermore by using task_active_pid_ns it becomes trivial to write an unshare implementation for the the pid namespace. So I have used task_active_pid_ns everywhere I can. In fork since the pid has not yet been attached to the process I use ns_of_pid, to achieve the same effect. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman --- kernel/cgroup.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/cgroup.c') diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c index f24f724620dd..0dbfba2efa77 100644 --- a/kernel/cgroup.c +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c @@ -3390,7 +3390,7 @@ static struct cgroup_pidlist *cgroup_pidlist_find(struct cgroup *cgrp, { struct cgroup_pidlist *l; /* don't need task_nsproxy() if we're looking at ourself */ - struct pid_namespace *ns = current->nsproxy->pid_ns; + struct pid_namespace *ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); /* * We can't drop the pidlist_mutex before taking the l->mutex in case -- cgit v1.2.2