From 50630195bbdfe1ca775d94cd68a5f18bc1b717e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Garzik Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:29:45 -0500 Subject: [libata] mark certain hardware (or drivers) with a no-atapi flag Some hardware does not support the PACKET command at all. Other hardware supports ATAPI, but the driver does something nasty such as calling BUG() when an ATAPI command is issued. For these such cases, we mark them with a new flag, ATA_FLAG_NO_ATAPI. Initial version contributed by Ben Collins. --- include/linux/libata.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'include/linux/libata.h') diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h index f2dbb684ce9e..41ea7dbc1755 100644 --- a/include/linux/libata.h +++ b/include/linux/libata.h @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ enum { ATA_FLAG_NOINTR = (1 << 9), /* FIXME: Remove this once * proper HSM is in place. */ ATA_FLAG_DEBUGMSG = (1 << 10), + ATA_FLAG_NO_ATAPI = (1 << 11), /* No ATAPI support */ ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE = (1 << 1), /* cmd not yet ack'd to scsi lyer */ ATA_QCFLAG_SG = (1 << 3), /* have s/g table? */ -- cgit v1.2.2