From f1191b50ec11c8e2ca766d6d99eb5bb9d2c084a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:35:18 -0400 Subject: check_unsafe_exec() doesn't care about signal handlers sharing ... since we'll unshare sighand anyway Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/exec.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index 07a059664b73..614991bf0c87 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1060,23 +1060,20 @@ int check_unsafe_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm) { struct task_struct *p = current, *t; unsigned long flags; - unsigned n_fs, n_sighand; + unsigned n_fs; int res = 0; bprm->unsafe = tracehook_unsafe_exec(p); n_fs = 1; - n_sighand = 1; write_lock(&p->fs->lock); lock_task_sighand(p, &flags); for (t = next_thread(p); t != p; t = next_thread(t)) { if (t->fs == p->fs) n_fs++; - n_sighand++; } - if (p->fs->users > n_fs || - atomic_read(&p->sighand->count) > n_sighand) { + if (p->fs->users > n_fs) { bprm->unsafe |= LSM_UNSAFE_SHARE; } else { if (p->fs->in_exec) -- cgit v1.2.2