From b24ae0b54be4e46bb88398f29c5f79c5dad2a602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:05:05 +0300 Subject: ocfs2/dlm: use GFP_ATOMIC inside a spin_lock My static checker complains that this is called with a spin_lock held in dlm_master_requery_handler() from dlmrecovery.c. Probably the reason we have not received any bug reports about this is that recovery is not a common operation. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Joel Becker Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/ocfs2') diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c index 005261c333b0..33ecbe0e6734 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c @@ -2020,7 +2020,7 @@ int dlm_dispatch_assert_master(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, int ignore_higher, u8 request_from, u32 flags) { struct dlm_work_item *item; - item = kzalloc(sizeof(*item), GFP_NOFS); + item = kzalloc(sizeof(*item), GFP_ATOMIC); if (!item) return -ENOMEM; -- cgit v1.2.2