From 46dad7603f21d64207820580c0bafd47934686d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 12:13:06 -0500
Subject: locks: clean up comment typo

Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
---
 fs/locks.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'fs/locks.c')

diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 2cfeea622f28..5e28612120c2 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter)
  * it seems like the reasonable thing to do.
  *
  * Must be called with both the i_lock and blocked_lock_lock held. The fl_block
- * list itself is protected by the file_lock_list, but by ensuring that the
+ * list itself is protected by the blocked_lock_lock, but by ensuring that the
  * i_lock is also held on insertions we can avoid taking the blocked_lock_lock
  * in some cases when we see that the fl_block list is empty.
  */
-- 
cgit v1.2.2