From 9d6a8c5c213e34c475e72b245a8eb709258e968c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Eshel Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:55:18 -0500 Subject: locks: give posix_test_lock same interface as ->lock posix_test_lock() and ->lock() do the same job but have gratuitously different interfaces. Modify posix_test_lock() so the two agree, simplifying some code in the process. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" --- fs/gfs2/locking/nolock/main.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/gfs2/locking/nolock') diff --git a/fs/gfs2/locking/nolock/main.c b/fs/gfs2/locking/nolock/main.c index acfbc941f319..5cc1dfa7944a 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/locking/nolock/main.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/locking/nolock/main.c @@ -164,13 +164,7 @@ static void nolock_unhold_lvb(void *lock, char *lvb) static int nolock_plock_get(void *lockspace, struct lm_lockname *name, struct file *file, struct file_lock *fl) { - struct file_lock tmp; - int ret; - - ret = posix_test_lock(file, fl, &tmp); - fl->fl_type = F_UNLCK; - if (ret) - memcpy(fl, &tmp, sizeof(struct file_lock)); + posix_test_lock(file, fl); return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.2