From 46b952a3c3a94afa339bd4961a4f3d1482436599 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:24:30 -0700 Subject: PCI: Fix IRQ swizzling for ARI-enabled devices For many purposes, including interrupt-swizzling, devices with ARI enabled behave as if they have one device (number 0) and 256 functions. This probably hasn't bitten us in practice because all ARI devices I've seen are also IOV devices, and IOV devices are required to use MSI. This isn't guaranteed, and there are legitimate reasons to use ARI without IOV, and hence potentially use pin-based interrupts. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes --- drivers/pci/pci.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers') diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c index d5d6f5667d83..dbd0f947f497 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c @@ -1517,11 +1517,20 @@ void pci_enable_ari(struct pci_dev *dev) * * Perform INTx swizzling for a device behind one level of bridge. This is * required by section 9.1 of the PCI-to-PCI bridge specification for devices - * behind bridges on add-in cards. + * behind bridges on add-in cards. For devices with ARI enabled, the slot + * number is always 0 (see the Implementation Note in section 2.2.8.1 of + * the PCI Express Base Specification, Revision 2.1) */ u8 pci_swizzle_interrupt_pin(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 pin) { - return (((pin - 1) + PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn)) % 4) + 1; + int slot; + + if (pci_ari_enabled(dev->bus)) + slot = 0; + else + slot = PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn); + + return (((pin - 1) + slot) % 4) + 1; } int -- cgit v1.2.2